Search title: Miranda V. Arizona: The Rights of the Accused | World's Biggest Leveled Book Database

Miranda V. Arizona: Rights of the Accused

Gail Blasser Riley

Library Binding (Enslow Pub Inc, Oct. 1, 1994)

Describes the development of the right to remain silent and to be represented by a lawyer, presents the case and each side's arguments, and discusses the decision and the "Miranda warnings" now read to suspects

Miranda v. Arizona: The Rights of the Accused

Michael Burgan

Library Binding (Compass Point Books, Sept. 1, 2006)

On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda confessed to three crimes. Based on his confession, Miranda was convicted at trial, but some lawyers thought Miranda's rights had been denied. The lawyers helped Miranda wage a three-year legal battle, which reached the U.S. Supreme Court. In an historic decision, the Court said anyone accused of a crime had "the right to remain silent." This and several other legal protections are now part of the Miranda Warning read to every person who is arrested in the United States.

V

Establishing the Rights of the Accused: Miranda V. Arizona

Don Rauf, Gail Blasser Riley

Library Binding (Enslow Pub Inc, Jan. 1, 2017)

Discusses the Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case, including how the constitutional right to a lawyer and against self-incrimination came to pass as well as its legacy.

Miranda Rights: Protecting The Rights Of The Accused

G S Prentzas

Library Binding (Rosen Pub Group, Aug. 1, 2005)

Describes the history of the Miranda rights, including the trial that led to its development.

Rights of the Accused

Andrea Campbell

Library Binding (Chelsea House Pub, Sept. 1, 2000)

Explains what a defendant's constitutionally guaranteed rights are, how they evolved, and how they sometimes conflict with public attitudes toward law enforcement.