Books with title Alchemy: Ancient and Modern

This book includes a brief account of the alchemistic doctrines and their relations to mysticism on the one hand, and to recent discoveries in physical science on the other hand, together with some particulars regarding the lives and teachings of the most noted alchemists. The book includes seven chapters as follows: (1) The Meaning of Alchemy, (2) The Theory of Physical Alchemy, (3) The Alchemists (Before Paracelsus), (4) The Alchemists (Paracelsus and After), (5) The Outcome of Alchemy, (6) The Age of Modern Chemistry, and (7) Modern Alchemy. It is a pleasure to publish this new, high quality, and affordable edition of this timeless book. This edition is amply illustrated.

The theory of the origin of Alchemy put forward in Chapter I has led to considerable discussion; but whilst this theory has met with general acceptance, some of its earlier critics took it as implying far more than is actually the case. As a result of further research my conviction of its truth has become more fully confirmed, and in my recent work entitled Bygone Beliefs, under the title of "The Quest of the Philosopher's Stone," I have found it possible to adduce further evidence in this connection. At the same time, whilst I became increasingly convinced that the main alchemistic hypotheses were drawn from the domain of mystical theology and applied to physics and chemistry by way of analogy, it also became evident to me that the crude physiology of bygone ages and remnants of the old phallic faith formed a further and subsidiary source of alchemistic theory. I have barely, if at all, touched on this matter in the present work; the reader who is interested will find it dealt with in some detail in "The Phallic Element in Alchemical Doctrine" in my Bygone Beliefs.

This book is an illustrated version of the original Alchemy Ancient and Modern by H. Stanley Redgrov. The basic idea permeating all the alchemistic theories appears to have been this: All the metals (and, indeed, all forms of matter) are one in origin, and are produced by an evolutionary process. The Soul of them all is one and the same; it is only the Soul that is permanent; the body or outward form, i.e., the mode of manifestation of the Soul, is transitory, and one form may be transmuted into another. The similarity, indeed it might be said, the identity, between this view and the modern etheric theory of matter is at once apparent.

It is a regrettable fact that the majority of works dealing with the subject of Alchemy take a one-sided point of view. The chemists generally take a purely physical view of the subject, and instead of trying to understand its mystical language, often prefer to label it nonsense and the alchemist a fool. On the other hand, the mystics, in many cases, take a purely transcendental view of the subject, forgetting the fact that the alchemists were, for the most part, concerned with operations of a physical nature. For a proper understanding of Alchemy, a synthesis of both points of view is essential; and, since these two aspects are so intimately and essentially connected with one another, this is necessary even when, as in the following work, one is concerned primarily with the physical, rather than the purely mystical, aspect of the subject.

Alchemy is generally understood to have been that art whose endwas the transmutation of the so-called base metals into gold bymeans of an ill-defined something called the Philosopher’s Stone; buteven from a purely physical standpoint, this is a somewhatsuperficial view. Alchemy was both a philosophy and anexperimental science, and the transmutation of the metals was itsend only in that this would give the final proof of the alchemistichypotheses; in other words, Alchemy, considered from the physicalstandpoint, was the attempt to demonstrate experimentally on thematerial plane the validity of a certain philosophical view of theCosmos. We see the genuine scientific spirit in the saying of one ofthe alchemists: “Would to God . . . all men might become adepts inour Art — for then gold, the great idol of mankind, would lose itsvalue, and we should prize it only for its scientific teaching.”1Unfortunately, however, not many alchemists came up to this ideal;and for the majority of them, Alchemy did mean merely thepossibility of making gold cheaply and gaining untold wealth.

Alchemy is generally understood to have been that art whose endwas the transmutation of the so-called base metals into gold bymeans of an ill-defined something called the Philosopher’s Stone; buteven from a purely physical standpoint, this is a somewhatsuperficial view. Alchemy was both a philosophy and anexperimental science, and the transmutation of the metals was itsend only in that this would give the final proof of the alchemistichypotheses; in other words, Alchemy, considered from the physicalstandpoint, was the attempt to demonstrate experimentally on thematerial plane the validity of a certain philosophical view of theCosmos. We see the genuine scientific spirit in the saying of one ofthe alchemists: “Would to God . . . all men might become adepts inour Art — for then gold, the great idol of mankind, would lose itsvalue, and we should prize it only for its scientific teaching.”1Unfortunately, however, not many alchemists came up to this ideal;and for the majority of them, Alchemy did mean merely thepossibility of making gold cheaply and gaining untold wealth.

Alchemy is generally understood to have been that art whose endwas the transmutation of the so-called base metals into gold bymeans of an ill-defined something called the Philosopher’s Stone; buteven from a purely physical standpoint, this is a somewhatsuperficial view. Alchemy was both a philosophy and anexperimental science, and the transmutation of the metals was itsend only in that this would give the final proof of the alchemistichypotheses; in other words, Alchemy, considered from the physicalstandpoint, was the attempt to demonstrate experimentally on thematerial plane the validity of a certain philosophical view of theCosmos. We see the genuine scientific spirit in the saying of one ofthe alchemists: “Would to God . . . all men might become adepts inour Art — for then gold, the great idol of mankind, would lose itsvalue, and we should prize it only for its scientific teaching.”1Unfortunately, however, not many alchemists came up to this ideal;and for the majority of them, Alchemy did mean merely thepossibility of making gold cheaply and gaining untold wealth.

Excerpt from Alchemy: Ancient and ModernIt is exceedingly gratifying to me that a second edition of this book should be called for. But still more welcome is the change in the attitude of the educated world towards the old-time alchemists and their theories which has taken place during the past few years.The theory of the origin of Alchemy put forward in Chapter I has led to considerable discussion; but whilst this theory has met with general acceptance, some of its earlier critics took it as implying far more than is actually the case As a result of further research my conviction of its truth has become more fully confirmed, and in my recent work entitled Bygone Beliefs (Rider, 1920), under the title of "The Quest of the Philosopher's Stone," I have found it possible to adduce further evidence in this connection. At the same time, whilst I became increasingly convinced that the main alchemistic hypotheses were drawn from the domain of mystical theology and applied to physics and chemistry by way of analogy, it also became evident to me that the crude physiology of bygone ages and remnants of the old phallic faith formed a further and subsidiary source of alchemistic theory.About the PublisherForgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.comThis book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

"Alchemy: Ancient and Modern" by H. Stanley Redgrove. Published by Good Press. Good Press publishes a wide range of titles that encompasses every genre. From well-known classics & literary fiction and non-fiction to forgotten−or yet undiscovered gems−of world literature, we issue the books that need to be read. Each Good Press edition has been meticulously edited and formatted to boost readability for all e-readers and devices. Our goal is to produce eBooks that are user-friendly and accessible to everyone in a high-quality digital format.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.