An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
David Hume
Paperback
(CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Nov. 28, 2016)
In this relatively brief 1748 volume, the empiricist David Hume virtually renounces his “juvenile” three-volume “Treatise of Human Nature,” written in his early twenties. Building, however, on certain themes from that work and on his impressions of John Locke’s AN ESSAY CONCERNING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, Hume constructs his particular philosophy. A skeptic from the outset, in a step-by-step presentation, he arrives at the sources and the development of human understanding, without ever reaching the conclusion that ours is the CORRECT understanding. It is, nevertheless, an understanding adequate and necessary for human existence. The society he kept, the abilities with which he was justly credited, the reputation his works deservedly won for him, made him a man of mark and influence in his day. Read by the learned, courted by statesmen, he taught gentlemen liberality, and governments toleration. The influence of Hume, silent and inappreciable to the multitude, has been of the utmost importance to the nation. His works have been studied by philosophers, politicians, and prelates . . . Oddly enough, none of Hume's works were popular when they first appeared . . . The world has since made up for its negligence, by perpetual comment and solid appreciation. — J. Watts in ANCIENT AND MODERN CELEBRATED FREETHINKERS (by Charles Bradlaugh, A. Collins, and J. Watts) The philosophy of Hume is significant amongst those of Europe, not merely from its intellectual features, as a system of opinion; but also from the way in which it developed tendencies, which were latent in English Philosophy from the first, and from the reaction which it inaugurated—the movement of reconstruction to which it gave rise…. He saw with, consummate clearness, the logical result of a system of which Experience is the alpha and the omega; and his destructive criticism has been quite as helpful to the progress of the human mind, as the constructive efforts which it overthrew, chiefly because it cleared the atmosphere of mist…thus preparing the way for the critical idealism of Kant, and rendering its rise inevitable. — William Knight, LL.D., HUME 1886