Browse all books

Books with title The Microscope

  • Microscopes

    Martin- Harvey

    Paperback (Purnell, June 15, 1977)
    None
  • The Microscope, Volume 11

    Anonymous

    Hardcover (Palala Press, Nov. 20, 2015)
    This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
  • Under the Microscope

    None

    Hardcover (Grolier Academic Reference, Dec. 1, 1999)
    None
    O
  • The Romance of the Microscope

    C. A. Ealand:

    Hardcover (London: Seeley Service & Co, )
    None
  • Under the Microscope

    None

    Hardcover (Grolier Academic Reference, Dec. 1, 1999)
    None
    O
  • Under the Microscope

    Mike Potter

    Paperback (Dorling Kindersley Publishers Ltd, July 27, 2000)
    None
  • The Microscope, Volume 11

    Anonymous

    Paperback (Ulan Press, Aug. 31, 2012)
    This book was originally published prior to 1923, and represents a reproduction of an important historical work, maintaining the same format as the original work. While some publishers have opted to apply OCR (optical character recognition) technology to the process, we believe this leads to sub-optimal results (frequent typographical errors, strange characters and confusing formatting) and does not adequately preserve the historical character of the original artifact. We believe this work is culturally important in its original archival form. While we strive to adequately clean and digitally enhance the original work, there are occasionally instances where imperfections such as blurred or missing pages, poor pictures or errant marks may have been introduced due to either the quality of the original work or the scanning process itself. Despite these occasional imperfections, we have brought it back into print as part of our ongoing global book preservation commitment, providing customers with access to the best possible historical reprints. We appreciate your understanding of these occasional imperfections, and sincerely hope you enjoy seeing the book in a format as close as possible to that intended by the original publisher.
  • The Microscope Volume 11

    Anonymous

    Paperback (RareBooksClub.com, Sept. 13, 2013)
    This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1891 edition. Excerpt: ...distinction of parts. In the body of such a creature even the highest available powers of the microscope reveal nothing more than a fairly uniform network of material... the intervals of th& meshwork being filled, now with a fluid, now with a more solid substance or with a finer and more delicate network, and minute particles or granules of variable size... Analysis with various staining and other reagents leads to the conclusion that the substance of the network is of a different character from the substance filling up the meshes. Similar analysis shows that at times the bars or films of the network are not homogeneous, but composed of different kinds of stuffs..." From this the reader sees that the author contradicts himself. If there is no visibledistinction of parts as he at firsts declares, why does he then call attention to the differences in composition and even to the different parts composing the cell of the Amoeba? Precisely because he cannot get over the idea that the cell is made of different stuffs as he calls it, and that there are parts in it which not only differ in composition but in appearance; in a word, the cell is not a homogenous substance but is composed of parts, in other words, it possesses structure. But in bringing together what is known of the cell it is not my purpose to enter into controversy; I therefore leave the reader free to hold his own opinions. I will state the thesis of Carnoy in his own worda, and follow him as closely as possible in its exposition and demonstration. Prof Carnoy maintains that, " Cells are elementary organisms or individualities of organized beings," and that the cell is "a structured and living mass of protoplasm surrounded by a membrane and containing a...